Skip to main content
UCAIug
Login | Join | Help (new window)
Home
IPR
Testing
About UCAIug
Meetings
Green Button ITCA
Other UCA Sites
What's New
Corporate Members
Join UCAIug

Modify settings and columns

UCAIug > UCAIug Draft IPP Comments > Comments on UCA IPR - Draft - 8910 document  

UCAIug Draft IPP Comments

  
View: 
Post
Started: 9/8/2010 3:13 PM
Picture Placeholder: ted.booth
ted.booth
Comments on "UCA IPR - Draft - 8/9/10" document

Hello:

I have 2 comments on the “UCA IPR – Draft – 8/9/10” document. 

1) In 8.b, it is not clear if another company makes a contribution that reads on Company X’s IP.  Clearly, Company X did not make the contribution so it should not be obligated to the terms of 8.b.  However, the UCA work product will include this IP that Company X owns (and did not contribute).  There does not appear to be any IP review of a UCA work product with any associated rules covering disclosure of IP included but not contributed by the owner.  Please advise here.

2) Regarding 8.b.i, it is typically very difficult to state terms and pricing before making a contribution.  If terms and pricing are not provided as part of the contribution, does it mean the contribution will be free?

Overall, as someone else has suggested, I think it would be very helpful to have a teleconference to discuss this document and associated Objectives further.

Thank you,

Ted Booth